I have a work-around for the problem:
I specify a dummy field of the type I want inside the vector somewhere else in the WSDL; this way that class is generated in Java and the de-serialization also works fine. However, I would like to know the right way to do this.
First and foremost -- don't expose Java collections through your WSDL interface. Turn that Vector into an array. Your WSDL interface should consist only of simple types, structures of simple types and arrays of simple types and/or structures of simple types.
Second -- if you insist on exposing collections through your interface, then your work-around (creating a dummy type to generate the serializer) is the right way to go. But be aware that you will encounter lots of interoperability issues.
Dig Deeper on Topics Archive
Related Q&A from Anne Thomas Manes
Anne Thomas Manes explains the differences between open source clients and open source implementations. Continue Reading
Anne Thomas Manes discusses the best way to go about creating an enterprise data dictionary and why the systems works well. Continue Reading
Anne Thomas Manes explains the difference between 'hard' real time and 'live' real time systems. Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.